;:: ...
|
![]()
|
![]()
![]()
.
.
|
. u The Potential of Stem Cell Research: Stem cells which are derived from human embryos could and (if research is allowed to continue) most probably will cure dozens of degenerative diseases - - diseases such as Parkinson's disease, arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, and cirrhosis of the liver, as well as presently irreversible injuries such as spinal cord damage. Because of the vast potential of this research, some notable scientists feel that stem cell research will very likely revolutionize medicine. The cures resulting from this research are expected to save the lives of millions and relieve millions more from lives of pain and misery. . Stem cells (which are at the core of this controversy) come from fertilized human eggs that have been allowed to divide for about a week until approximately one hundred cells are produced. Some of these cells are then extracted and used for medical research. Why use these particular cells? Because they are capable of being transformed into any kind of human tissue - - tissue that can then be used to repair the bodies of humans affected by degenerative diseases. The research in this field is still in the very beginning stages and yet phenomenal, positive, and encouraging results have already occurred. . |
.
.
|
. u The Anti-Abortionists Oppose Stem Cell Research: The Anti-abortionists oppose stem cell research because it uses human embryonic tissue. Based on their claim that this embryonic tissue is a new, separate, sovereign, individual, human being, they are attempting to pass legislation that would criminalize this type of research. They propose punishing any researcher who uses stem cells with a ten-year jail term and a one million dollar fine. If they succeed in criminalizing stem cell research, millions who could be saved will continue to die and millions more will live lives of misery in diseased bodies. . u Their "Reasoning," Their Assumptions,and The Consequences: In the words of one anti-abortionist, Ken Connor, president of Research Family Council, "We believe very strongly that people should not be discriminated against based on age or location in a petri dish. Stem cells can only be derived by killing the tiniest and most helpless of human beings." Connor's statement follows the typical logic of the Anti-abortion leaders. It starts out with an "I believe" clause (as if what he believes should be the basis for secular law). He then brings in a declaration based one or more unproven assumptions In this case, the assumptions are: 1) that God created a brand new human being in that petri dish at sometime during the process of egg and sperm uniting, 2) that a fertilized human egg is a new, separate, sovereign, individual, human being, and 3) that interfering with the development of that egg into a human body is an act of murder. His assumption can only be true only if all five, of the unproven, anti-abortionist's core assumptions° are actual provable reality. The typical statement closes with a therefore conclusion (missing but implied in the above quote) -- Stem cell research should be prohibited by law. Because the five, unprovable, core assumptions° are personal, religious beliefs that have no scientific basis, the forced-motherhood leaders are proposing still another round of religious tyranny. And, in the process, are intending to sacrifice the lives and health of millions of their fellow humans. This is definitely not pro-life. The anti-abortion leaders may be pro-embryo, but they certainly are not pro-life! . |
.
|
. .
. . |
.
.
|
.
.
|
|
The evidence overwhelmingly indicates that The only way to be pro-life is to be pro-choice.° |
|
. .
. Copyright © 2000 -- Revisions Copyright 2001-2004 Rev. Robert E. Coté All rights reserved For details, see: Terms of Use°. --- Privacy Statement° 000 --- New Page Template http://www.choice101.com/ r31-stem-cell.html. |
|
Are you aware that the anti-abortion leaders produce more abortions° than they prevent? |
![]()
.
.
.
|
. ... |
.